Legal Opinion

State v. Hankerson

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 15, 2009No. AC 30738PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HARPER, J.

The defendant, Rodney Hankerson, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of felony murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54c, robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (1) and robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (3). The defendant claims that the court failed to explain the doctrine of proximate causation adequately in its instruction as to the crime of felony murder. We decline to review the claim and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. State v. WhitfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. State v. EbronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  5. State v. HolnessSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hankerson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
  2. State v. NazarianConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. State v. MyersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  4. Hankerson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  5. State v. BellamySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API