Legal Opinion

In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of Vanneck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 1, 1916PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal by the Comptroller of the State of New York from an order of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of New York, entered in the office of said Surrogate’s Court on the 13th day of May, 1916, reversing a prior order fixing the transfer tax in this estate.

1Opinion of the Court

Page, J.:

The order from which the appeal is taken reverses a former order that approved the report of the appraiser and remits the matter to the appraiser with the direction to deduct from the value of the property of the decedent, as found in his report, estimated trustees’ commissions on the two trust funds amounting to $12,000 and $1,000,000 respectively. The Comptroller has appealed from this order, claiming that trustees’ commissions should not be allowed on either of these funds.

The decedent left a net estate of $1,645,301.06 consisting of cash and securities. The 4th clause of his will…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of ZieglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Leask v. BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of AbrahamsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  2. In Re McKinney's EstateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  3. In re the Estate of GrossmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  4. In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of BlunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  5. In re the Estate of GregoryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API