Legal Opinion

Petro Express, LTD., William Bobbora, Richard Stinson, and James Jongebloed v. Horkey Oil Company, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided April 12, 2005No. 07-03-00052-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

NO. 07-03-0052-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

APRIL 12, 2005

______________________________

JAMES JONGEBLOED, APPELLANT

V

HORKEY OIL COMPANY, INC., APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 99 TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2001-512,745-A; HONORABLE MACKEY HANCOCK, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

James Jongebloed challenges the trial court’s judgment that Horkey Oil Company, Inc. have and recover $515,887.31, plus interest and costs, based upon a written guaranty…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McGalliard v. KuhlmannTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Hubacek v. Ennis State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Clanton v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Lorusso v. Members Mutual Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Maranatha Temple, Inc. v. Enterprise Products Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API