Legal Opinion

Baur v. Lee

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1937No. 15,809Published

1Opinion of the CourtBridwell, C. J.

Appellee has filed a verified motion to dismiss this appeal alleging as reasons for dismissal, among others, that no assignment of errors has been “entered on the transcript” as required by section 2-3225 Burns Ind. Stat. Anno. 1933, section 502 Baldwin’s Ind. St. 1934, and that no such assignment has been attached to the transcript as provided for by rule 4 of the Rules of Supreme and Appellate Courts of this state. Appellants have made no showing to the contrary. An examination of the .record substantiates the allegations of said motion in this respect.

We find among the files in this cause…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Huber v. TielkingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Wiggs v. KoontzIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Hays v. JohnsIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Henry v. State Ex Rel. ThuermerIndiana Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API