Legal Opinion

Wiggs v. Koontz

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Randolph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

This was an action by appellee against appellant upon a promissory note executed by the appellant to G. D. Wharton, and by him assigned to the appellee.

There was issue, trial by the court, and finding for appellee. Motion for a new trial overruled, and judgment on the finding.

It is insisted by counsel for appellee, that the record presents no question for our decision, and various reasons are assigned.

1. That there is no proper assignment of errors.

2. That the bill of exceptions is not in the record.

*4313. That, conceding that the bill, of exceptions was filed within the time limited, it is so…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kesler v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Stewart v. RankinIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kitchen v. SchusterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Huber v. TielkingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Standard Peanut Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  4. Deputy v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Baur v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API