Legal Opinion

McGraw v. Weeks

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 21, 1996No. 95-1220PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Dalton Weeks, Jr., appellee, filed this tort action for damage to his cotton crop as the result of drifting of the chemical 2,4-D after it was applied to nearby rice fields. A hormone herbicide, 2,4-D is suitable for use in rice fields, but it has a propensity to damage cotton; consequendy, its use is restricted by the Arkansas State Plant Board. In 1991, when appellant Terry McGraw and Billy Jayroe applied 2,4-D to the rice fields, the Plant Board regulations prohibited the application of 2,4-D within one mile of cotton. Appellant McGraw, a farm manager, directed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Skinner v. R.J. Griffin & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Oliver B. Cannon & Son, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
  3. Blaylock v. StreckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Woodward v. BlytheSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  5. Cash v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. SharpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  3. Ouachita Wilderness Institute v. MergenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Bedell v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Chambers v. SternSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API