Legal Opinion
Arakaki v. Lingle
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided November 21, 2003No. Civil 02-00139 SOM/KSCPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF STANDING ORDERS; ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ RULE 51(b) REQUEST; ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIM REGARDING THE HAWAIIAN HOME LANDS LEASE PROGRAM; ORDER DENYING REMAINDER OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS; ORDER DENYING THE UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO STRIKE; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE CLAIMS OF SANDRA BURGESS, DONNA SCAFF, AND EVELYN ARAKAKI SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
MOLLWAY, District Judge.
1. INTRODUCTION.
The court’s earlier rulings have left Plaintiffs with two claims based only on Plaintiffs’ status as state taxpayers.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. HaysSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Doremus v. Board of Ed. of HawthorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arakaki v. LingleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Arakaki v. ApolionaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Arakaki v. LingleDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2003
- Maunakea v. Hu (In Re Maunakea)District Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- No. 04-15306Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007