Legal Opinion
Medeiros v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 16, 2007No. B193042PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
In this writ proceeding, petitioners Mary and Lee Medeiros (collectively, Medeiros) challenge the trial court’s order compelling them to arbitrate a dispute with their health insurer, real party in interest Health Net. Medeiros contends the arbitration provision at issue is unenforceable because it does not comply with the disclosure requirements set forth in Health and Safety Code section 1363.1. Health Net asserts, as a member of a group health plan negotiated between Health Net and Medeiros’s employer, Medeiros is not entitled to the protection of these disclosures.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Madden v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Robertson v. Health Net of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Malek v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Atlas Plastering, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Imbler v. Pacificare of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Parada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Ramos v. Superior Court of San Francisco Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Rodriguez v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Ahn v. Sanger CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Ahn v. Sanger CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.