Rodriguez v. Blue Cross of California
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COOPER, P. J.
Health and Safety Code section 1363.1 governs required disclosures in health care service plans when binding arbitration is included as a contract term. The purpose of section 1363.1 “is to protect health care consumers from the consequences of unknowingly waiving their right to a jury trial.” (Malek v. Blue Cross of California (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 44, 71 [16 Cal.Rptr.3d 687] (Malek).) The trial court denied Blue Cross of California and BC Life & Health Insurance Company’s petition to compel arbitration, finding that the disclosure in the individual enrollment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
- Robertson v. Health Net of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Kobzoff v. Los Angeles County Harbor/UCLA Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Malek v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McAllister v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Baglione v. Health Net of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- Siopes v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc..Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013