Legal Opinion

Balsamo v. Sheriff

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1977No. 9606PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*316OPINION

2Per curiam

At the conclusion of a preliminary examination, Vito Balsamo was ordered to stand trial for obtaining money in an amount exceeding $100 under false pretenses, a felony under NRS 205.380. He then filed a pretrial petition for a writ of habeas corpus contending the evidence adduced before the magistrate was insufficient to support the charge. The district judge denied habeas and, in this appeal, Balsamo advances the same contention.

Balsamo agreed to perform certain construction work for Herbert Frey. In order to purchase the materials for the job, Balsamo obtained from Frey a check in…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. BallardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Polisher v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Chaplin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  5. Brymer v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court · 1976

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hale v. BurkhardtNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. MooreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API