Legal Opinion
Piscor v. Village of Hibbing
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 14, 1927No. 25,600PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 211 N.W. 952. Appeal by defendant from an order denying its motion in the alternative for judgment or a new trial.
Plaintiff sued for damages resulting from injuries received when she fell because of alleged defect in or adjacent to a sidewalk. The complaint described the defect as a hole immediately adjoining the sidewalk about five feet west of the intersection of the easterly sidewalk on St. Louis street with the northerly sidewalk on Josephine street in the village of Hibbing.
The evidence discloses that St. Louis street runs north and south and Josephine street east and west.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wright v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Anderson v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- McClain v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Hampton v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Dorgan v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McDonough v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Campion v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Stephenson v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Olson v. City of St. JamesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986