Legal Opinion

Dorgan v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 23, 1917No. 20,481PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action in the district court- for Ramsey county to recover $2,500 for injuries received, while walking across a street in defendant city and $100 for medical expenses. The answer alleged negligence on the part of plaintiff.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court- for Ramsey county to recover $2,500 for injuries received, while walking across a street in defendant city and $100 for medical expenses. The answer alleged negligence on the part of plaintiff. The case was tried before Dickson, J., who when plaintiff rested denied defendant’s motion to dismiss and at the close of the testimony denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, and a jury which returned a verdict for $250. From an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict- or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Action to recover for personal injuries sustained by slipping and falling into a hole in the ice and snow upon a public street in the city of St. Paul. Plaintiff recovered -a verdict. From an order denying its motion for judgment or for a new trial defendant appealed.

Carroll avenue and Louis street intersect at right angles, each having curbs and sidewalks on either side, but no cross-walks. There is a catch basin at the curb on the south side of Carroll avenue, at a point some 2 feet west of the sidewalk line on the west side of Louis street. The bottom of the opening into this catch basin…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Piscor v. Village of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Harning v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API