Legal Opinion
United States v. Hymes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 22, 2004No. 03-30354PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Donald Louis Hymes appeals pro se his jury conviction and sentence for mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341), receiving mail addressed to a false name (18 U.S.C. § 1342), conversion of money of the United States (18 U.S.C. § 641), money laundering (18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B)®), and criminal contempt of court (18 U.S.C. § 401(3)). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm the conviction and remand for resentencing.
Hymes contends that the mail fraud counts were barred by the applicable five-year statute of limitations, 18 U.S.C. § 3282, because the mail fraud scheme began more…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Ruth StudleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Daniel Joe ChischillyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Mark Kevin HicksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. AltamiranoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Johnson v. AltamiranoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Perez v. State of NevadaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023