Legal Opinion

Lyman v. Bavar Company, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 1984No. Docket 65418PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. G. Roskopp, J.

In this action, plaintiff sought to recover damages from defendants Brower and Melchert on a negligence theory and from defendant Bavar Company, Inc., pursuant to the dram-shop act, MCL 436.22; MSA 18.993. After a jury trial, a verdict for plaintiff was returned in the amount of $375,000 against all three defendants. Plaintiff’s recovery against defendants Brower and Melchert was reduced by 10% for plaintiff’s comparative negligence. Defendant Bavar Company appeals as of right.

Bavar Company argues that the verdict against it should have been reduced by 10% for plaintiff’s comparative…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Smith v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Hardy v. Monsanto Enviro-Chem Systems, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Genesee Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. BourrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Dahn v. SheetsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Craig v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Reeves v. GentileUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. McCAW v. T & L OPERATIONS, INCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Brown v. Swartz Creek Memorial Post 3720—veterans of Foreign Wars, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Craig v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API