Lyman v. Bavar Company, Inc.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJ. G. Roskopp, J.
In this action, plaintiff sought to recover damages from defendants Brower and Melchert on a negligence theory and from defendant Bavar Company, Inc., pursuant to the dram-shop act, MCL 436.22; MSA 18.993. After a jury trial, a verdict for plaintiff was returned in the amount of $375,000 against all three defendants. Plaintiff’s recovery against defendants Brower and Melchert was reduced by 10% for plaintiff’s comparative negligence. Defendant Bavar Company appeals as of right.
Bavar Company argues that the verdict against it should have been reduced by 10% for plaintiff’s comparative…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Smith v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Hardy v. Monsanto Enviro-Chem Systems, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Genesee Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. BourrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Dahn v. SheetsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Craig v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Reeves v. GentileUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- McCAW v. T & L OPERATIONS, INCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Brown v. Swartz Creek Memorial Post 3720—veterans of Foreign Wars, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Craig v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.