Betts v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMANDA BETTS, Plaintiff, v. No. 21-cv-1861-CKK-MAU WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY Defendant. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Amanda Betts (“Betts”) sued Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) for employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
29 U.S.C. § 701
et seq. Betts claims that WMATA discriminated and retaliated against her by issuing her subpar performance evaluations, suspending and terminating her, and not…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.