Legal Opinion

Betts v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 17, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2021-1861Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMANDA BETTS, Plaintiff, v. No. 21-cv-1861-CKK-MAU WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY Defendant. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Amanda Betts (“Betts”) sued Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) for employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,

29 U.S.C. § 701

et seq. Betts claims that WMATA discriminated and retaliated against her by issuing her subpar performance evaluations, suspending and terminating her, and not…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API