Zuendel v. Zuendel
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The issue before us is whether the probate court had jurisdiction to address the appellants’ complaint for declaratory judgment. For the reasons that follow, we find that the probate court did not have jurisdiction to render a declaratory judgment regarding the validity and enforceability of the March 1989 agreement.
*735The probate court is a court of limited jurisdiction. The court has only that jurisdiction which is granted by statute and by Constitution. Corron v. Corron (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 75, 531 N.E.2d 708; Schucker v. Metcalf (1986), 22 Ohio St.3d 33, 22 OBR 27, 488 N.E.2d 210.
In…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Corron v. CorronOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Schucker v. MetcalfOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re Estate of MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
3Cited by13 opinions
- Buckman-Peirson v. BrannonOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State ex rel. Lipinski v. Cuyahoga County Common Pleas CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Lipinski v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, Probate Div.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
- Grimes v. GrimesOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Santomauro v. McLaughlinOhio Supreme Court · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.