Legal Opinion
Cranmer v. Cordell & Cordell P.C.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided August 9, 2024No. 6:23-cv-01066Unknown
1Opinion
In the United States District Court for the District of Kansas _____________ Case No. 23-cv-01066-TC _____________ TAMMY CRANMER, Plaintiff v. CORDELL & CORDELL, P.C., Defendant _____________ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Tammy Cranmer sues her former employer, Cordell & Cordell, as- serting three distinct discrimination and retaliation claims. Doc. 97. Cordell & Cordell requests summary judgment on all three claims. Doc. 99. Cranmer seeks sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37. Doc. 131. For the following reasons, Cordell & Cordell’s motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.