Dunn v. Sarno
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtBrooks, P. J.
This is an action of tort with a stated ad damnum of $10,000.
Plaintiff’s declaration is in two counts. The first count alleges that on or about the third day of May, 1959, he was the owner of a horse, and while riding said horse and in the exercise of due care, a dog owned by the defendant viciously and without provocation attacked the plaintiff’s horse causing injury and damage thereto. He further alleged that he was not teasing or tormenting the defendant’s dog. The second count in addition to the above allegations stated that plaintiff received personal injuries. Defendant’s answer was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spade v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Commonwealth v. BellinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Homans v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Sullivan v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- Hardiman v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.