Legal Opinion

Hollywood Credit Clothing Co. v. Brooks

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 9, 1956No. 1833PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ROVER, Chief Judge.

Hollywood sued Brooks for a balance due for merchandise allegedly purchased on December 24, 1954. The case was tried before a judge, who at the conclusion of all the evidence, made a finding for Brooks and entered judgment accordingly. Hollywood appeals.

At the trial the evidence for Hollywood consisted of a sales contract and record card purporting to show that on the date in question Brooks purchased the merchandise and that no part of the purchase price had been paid; the sales contract contained a clause whereby the purchaser agreed to pay for the merchandise; a space…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nolan v. WerthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  2. Storley v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  3. United States v. Washington Dehydrated Food Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  4. Obold v. OboldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  5. Capital View Realty Company v. CohenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API