Legal Opinion

Woodrow v. Wildlife Commission

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 2009No. 08CA0753PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Chief Judge DAVIDSON.

Plaintiffs, Frank J. Woodrow, Jerry Tru-dell, Harold Whittle, William Trudell, and Brian Wilson, seek judicial review of the one-year suspension of their hunting and fishing license privileges, imposed by defendant, the Wildlife Commission. We affirm.

During hunting season, plaintiffs drove across private property adjacent to public lands open for hunting, while in possession of hunting firearms and licenses, and dressed in "hunter safety orange." They were charged with hunting on private property without permission in violation of section 33-6-116, C.R.S.2008, a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Femedeer v. HaunCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. Parrish v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Northern Integrated Supply Project Water Activity Enterprise, a government-owned business organized pursuant to C.R.S. §§ 37-45.1-101 et seq v. VIMA Partners, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company; City of Thornton, a Colorado home rule municipality; DCP Midstream, LP, a Delaware limited partnership; WES DJ Gathering LLC f/k/a Kerr-McGee Gathering LLC, a Colorado limited liability company; and Brigitte C. Grimm, in her official capacity as Weld County Treasurer, Respondents:Supreme Court of Colorado · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API