Legal Opinion

Stepan v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1928No. 6,225PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

Appeal from a judgment, in favor of the plaintiffs, for damages for alleged trespass upon a patented mining claim.

The facts as they appear from the pleadings, the proof and the findings of the court, sitting without a jury, are substantially 'as follows: In the year 1883 the Utah & Northern Railway Company, having complied with the requirements of the law relative to rights of way, constructed a railway line extending from the city of Butte in a northerly direction. Where this line approached the quarter-section line in the north half of section 7 in township 3, north of range 5 west, it…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Newhall v. SangerSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Bybee v. Oregon & California RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Northern Pacific Railroad v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Rio Grande Western Railway Co. v. StringhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. Elm Orlu Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. King County v. AbernathyWashington Supreme Court · 2024
  3. King County v. AbernathyWashington Supreme Court · 2024
  4. MacDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  5. MacDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API