Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 8, 1941No. 9624Published

1Opinion of the Court

119 F.2d 821 (1941)

MACDONALD

v.

UNITED STATES.

GREAT NORTHERN RY. CO.

v.

SAME.

No. 9624.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 8, 1941.

W. H. Hoover, J. E. Corette, Jr., and L. V. Ketter, all of Butte, Mont., for appellant MacDonald.

F. G. Dorety, Gen. Counsel, of St. Paul, Minn., and T. B. Weir, of Helena, Mont., for appellant Great Northern Ry. Co.

Norman M. Littell, Asst. U. S. Atty. Gen., John B. Tansil, U. S. Atty., of Butte, Mont., and Vernon L. Wilkinson, Atty., Department of Justice, of Washington, D. C., for appellee the United States.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

HEA…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Noble v. Union River Logging RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Leavenworth, Lawrence, & Galveston Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Buttz v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API