Legal Opinion
Slusher v. Paramount Warrior, Incorporated
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided November 16, 1971No. Civ. A. 70-C-130-RPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
DALTON, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a citizen of the State of Virginia, has filed a complaint alleging liability against the defendant, Paramount Warrior Incorporated (hereinafter Paramount), for injuries allegedly caused by the negligent acts of the defendant’s employees. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332. The defendant has moved for dismissal of this action on the ground that the plaintiff’s exclusive remedy for the injuries was recovery of compensation under the Virginia Workmen’s Compensation Act.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Feitig v. ChalkleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
- Sykes v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- Fauver v. BellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
- Anderson v. Thorington Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1959
- Burroughs v. Walmont, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Joseph W. Spangler v. Kranco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- Dorothy M. Farish, Guardian for Shirley F. Farish v. Courion Industries, Inc. And Otis Elevator CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- David White Crane Service v. HowellSupreme Court of Virginia · 2011
- Bell v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1972
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.