State v. Roy
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
The state appeals from an order that determined that defendant had committed a probation violation and that continued defendant’s probation, rather than revoking probation and imposing a sanction of imprisonment. The state argues that the trial court erred in failing to revoke defendant’s probation and, particularly, that the court’s failure in that regard violated the terms of a stipulated sentencing agreement by which a violation of probation would result in the revocation of probation and the imposition of a 16-month prison term. As explained below, we conclude that the order is not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. Illig-RennOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Weatherspoon v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Carlile v. FrostOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014