Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hutchinson Technology, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2004No. 02-3328Published

1DissentPatience D. Roggensack, J.

¶ 45. (dissenting). The majority opinion concludes that because Hutchinson Technology, Inc. (HTI) refused to permit the claimant, Susan Roytek, to work 56 hours every two weeks, rather than the 84 hours every two weeks that she was hired to work, it has unreasonably failed to accommodate her disability; and therefore, HTI has discriminated against her in violation of the Wisconsin *423Fair Employment Act (WFEA). However, I conclude no WFEA violation occurred because Roytek's offer to continue working only two-thirds of her shift is insufficient to be an "accommodation," as that term is used in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. US Airways, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Bruno v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Stockbridge School District v. Department of Public Instruction School District Boundary Appeal BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API