Franklin v. Herbert Lehman College
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TENNEY, District Judge.
The existence of multiple remedies for employment discrimination may be a mixed blessing under certain circumstances. In this Title VII action, 1 the plaintiff started down and followed one avenue of relief after several government agencies indicated that she was on the right track. Unfortunately, her failure to explore alternate routes within the specified time has now foreclosed those paths. The Court recognizes that Title VII’s limitations periods may be subject to equitable considerations and that the administrative procedures followed here left much to be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Judy C. EGELSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE AT GENESEO Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Cleda Jean Chappell v. Emco MacHine Works CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Kathleen T. HART, Appellant, v. J. T. BAKER CHEMICAL COMPANYCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lexine PERDUE, Appellant, v. ROY STONE TRANSFER CORPORATION; Lonnie Hodges; Ben Koontz; AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Leite v. Kennecott Copper Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1983
- Diaz v. Antilles Conversion & Export, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999
- Nielsen v. Flower HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Crossman v. CrossonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.