Keystone Oil Burner Co. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
Motion by the defendants Apex Oil Burner Corp. and Thau to compel plaintiffs to serve a further amended complaint separately stating and numbering alleged causes of action, pursuant to rule 90 of the Rules of Civil Practice.
The gravamen of the second and third causes of action of the plaintiff Seal-O-Strain Corp. is libel based upon an alleged false financial report which the respective moving defendants are charged with having published at various times to each of thirteen individuals mentioned in paragraph fourteenth of the amended complaint.
It is the position of the moving defendants that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wolfson v. Syracuse Newspapers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Cook v. . ConnersNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Fried, Mendelson & Co. v. Edmund Halstead, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Woodhouse v. New York Evening Post, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Fisher v. New Yorker Staats-ZeitungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.