Legal Opinion
City of Fort Worth v. Pippen
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 26, 1968No. 16898PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*241OPINION
MASSEY, Chief Justice.
The appeal is from a judgment non ob-stante veredicto rendered in behalf of defendants Harvey G. Pippen and Rattikin Title Company, a corporation, in a suit against said defendants and Herman F. Hall. Plaintiff City of Fort Worth obtained judgment against defendant Hall and he did not appeal.
Reversed and rendered.
LEGAL PRINCIPLES
Declarations upon abstract is the method adopted in beginning this opinion.
Under well known principles of contract and agency law a principal who desires to purchase property of a third party through his agent may contract to make the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Associated Oil Co. v. HartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- City of San Antonio v. Pigeonhole Parking of Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1958
- Ferguson v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Camden Fire Ins. Co. v. YarbroughTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Pershing v. HenryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Fort Worth v. PippenTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- English v. Ramo, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- English v. Ramo, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971