Legal Opinion

Honeywell Protection Services v. Tandem Telecommunications, Inc.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided November 1, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jacqueline W. Silbermann, J.

This is a motion by defendant seeking to vacate plaintiffs demand for a trial de novo.

Although counsel for plaintiff appeared at the arbitration hearing, no witnesses or evidence were presented in support of plaintiffs cause of action or in opposition to the defendant’s counterclaim. As a result of plaintiffs failure to present evidence an award was made in favor of defendant dismissing plaintiffs cause of action and awarding defendant judgment on its counterclaim.

The rules governing compulsory arbitration provide that a trial de novo may be…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Finamore v. Huntington Cardiac Rehabilitation Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Valot v. Allcity InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1986
  3. Doyle v. Amtec ManagementCivil Court of the City of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API