Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Amtec Management

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided April 6, 1989Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard S. Lane, J.

The renewal of motion by defendants Amtec Management and Norman Wasserman to vacate arbitration award in favor of plaintiff raises a significant issue in the administration of mandatory arbitration pursuant to the Rules of the Chief Judge (22 NYCRR) part 28.

The motion was originally returnable on March 10, 1989 and was denied by Judge Stuart Cohen by reason of no appearance by either side (CPLR 2216 [a]).

Without opposition, renewal is allowed, but, on renewal, the motion has to be denied again.

The award in this breach of contract claim bears a legend *293noti…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Honeywell Protection Services v. Tandem Telecommunications, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API