Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Harris

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1858PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District, County of Placer. A statement of. the facts apjmars in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The defendant, on the 5th day of December, 1854, verbally agreed with the plaintiff to sell him a house and lot, and certain furniture in the house, for the sum of $800—$400 to be paid at the time, and the remainder on the 1st day of June, 1855. The defendant was to make to plaintiff a good and sufficient title to the premises, within thirty days from the date of the agreement. The plaintiff at once took possession of the house, lot, and furniture, with the permission of the defendant. After the expiration of the thirty days, the plaintiff demanded of the defendant a good and sufficient…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Norton v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Whyte v. RosencrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Frey v. StanglSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Doke v. BrockhurstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Gamsby v. RaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API