Legal Opinion

Frey v. Stangl

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 11, 1910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Carroll District Court. — Hon. Z. A. Church, Judge. Action to recover for money paid on a parol contract for the purchase of land in Missouri resulted in judgment as prayed. The defendant. appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

The parties hereto entered into a written contract March 11, 1904, by the terms of which plaintiff undertook to buy of the defendant for the consideration of $16,000, two hundred and forty acres of land in Missouri. Therein he agreed to assume the payment of an indebtedness of $6,000 and another of $6,200 secured by trust deeds of the land, to execute a note to defendant for $2,300 upon taking possession of the sainé with a deed of trust securing it, March 1, 1905, and presently to execute a note for $1,500 payable without interest on that day. The instrument contained no recitals of what was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brandeis v. NeustadtlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Flinn v. BarberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  3. Day v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Shaw v. ShawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1834
  5. Crabtree v. WellesIllinois Supreme Court · 1857

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kilpatrick v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  3. Pardoe v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Reedy v. EbsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Gilman v. McDanielsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API