Legal Opinion

Mara v. Brown, No. Hdsp 119028 (May 15, 2002)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided May 15, 2002No. HDSP 119028Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

The defendant has moved to dismiss this summary process action on the grounds that there was a Section 8 lease which was subject to the provisions of 24 C.F.R. § 982, and neither the notice to quit nor the complaint was in compliance with those provisions.

The plaintiff filed a one count complaint alleging lapse of time. The notice to quit stated the following reasons: 1) Lapse of time; 2) One or more persons never had a right or privilege to occupy the premises; and 3) one person originally had a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jefferson Garden Associates v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. City of Bridgeport v. Barbour-Daniel Electronics, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  3. Park Terrace Associates Limited Partnership v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API