Legal Opinion
Imel v. Forte Products
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 30, 2020No. 5:19-cv-04107Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ZACHARY IMEL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 19-4107-JWB-ADM FORTE PRODUCTS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the court on Defendant’s Motion to Compel. (ECF No. 31.) Plaintiff Zachary Imel asserts that his former employer, Defendant Forte Products (“Forte”), unlawfully discriminated against him on the basis of his disability when the company terminated his employment, allegedly for a series of “no-call, no-shows” after Mr. Imel sustained serious injuries from a fireworks accident resulting in the amputation of his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gaylon Hofer v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Sonnino v. University of Kansas Hospital AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- General Electric Capital Corp. v. Lear Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Johnson v. Kraft Foods North America, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.