Legal Opinion

Innis v. Cedar Rapids, Iowa Falls & Northwestern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 18, 1888PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Palo Alto District Court. — Hon. Lot Thomas, Judge. Action in equity to abate an alleged nuisance. The district court, on the hearing, dismissed the petition. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

— The act complained of is the erection and maintenance of a railroad bridge over a body of *166water known as Medium lake. Plaintiff alleged that said lake is a public, navigable water, and that the bridge maintained by defendants is an obstruction to the free use thereof for purposes of navigation. On the hearing in this court a number of questions were elaborately argued by counsel, but we have found it necessary to consider the single question whether, conceding the navigable character of the lake, and that the bridge is an obstruction, plaintiff has such interest as will enable him to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blackwell v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Ewell v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  3. Wilson v. SexonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  4. Prince v. McCoySupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  5. Prosser v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Jackman Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Fogg v. Nevada-California-Oregon RailwayNevada Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Redway v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Swain v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911
  5. Doebler v. DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API