Legal Opinion
Smith v. Penta
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 19, 1979Published
1Opinion of the Court
81 N.J. 65 (1979)
405 A.2d 350
MURIEL S. SMITH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ROSE PENTA, JUDGE OF BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DISTRICT ONE, BOROUGH OF HIGHLANDS, ALYNN TRACY HECK, SUPERINTENDENT OF ELECTIONS, COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ANN FLYNN, MONMOUTH COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued October 16, 1978.
Decided July 19, 1979.
Mr. William E. Wilson argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Stephen Skillman argued the cause for respondents (Mr. John J. Degnan, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Ms. Erminie L. Conley,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.