Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

May v. Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 1991No. D010004PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NARES, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Henry C. May, doing business as May Enterprises (May), sued his marine insurance company, Lloyds of London (Lloyds), in federal court for damages including his attorneys’ fees, alleging causes of action for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, bad faith and negligence relating to the stranding of his tuna boat. May settled with Lloyds for $115,000, May then proceeded to trial before a jury on his state action against his insurance brokers, defendants and respondents Joseph C. Miller, Betty S. Hamlin, William R. Hamlin & Associates, Inc.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Laurenzi v. VranizanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. C. B. v. City of SonoraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Decker v. Tramiel (In Re JTS Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Hoch v. Allied-Signal, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Bostick v. Flex Equip. Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Jackson v. YarbrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API