Legal Opinion
United States v. Lytle
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 27, 1988No. 87 CR 135PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
John Lytle (“Lytle”), William Patterson (“Patterson”) and Jere Sturgis (“Sturgis”) have been indicted five times (!) under the federal wire fraud and misapplication of bank funds statutes, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 (“Section 1343”) and 656, for alleged schemes to defraud Continental Illinois National Bank (“Continental”). 1 Lytle and Sturgis have now moved to dismiss the fourth and fifth indictments (the first three having already been disposed of) on a variety of grounds. 2 Lytle has also moved alternatively (1) to dismiss the fifth indictment for…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Robert E. Smith (98-5888) Kathy Burch (98-5894) Raymond Burch (98-5895) Danny Eakles (98-5898) Deborah Eakles (98-5939)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Nelson ItalianoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Hartford Insurance Company of Illinois, the American Insurance Company, Third-Party v. United States of America, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. William D. SchimmelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. FinleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.