Legal Opinion

In Re Ridgley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1932No. Calendar 36,746PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

In Ridgley v. Ridgley, 256 Mich. 359, it was held—

“that Walter had the money in his possession, or under his control, and the order of the trial court that he should forthwith pay it to the clerk of the court is affirmed”—

and decree was ordered accordingly.

Decree was entered “requiring the said defendant to, forthwith, pay to the clerk of this court the sum of $7,140.70,” etc.

Later Walter Ridgley was committed for contempt, quoting from commitment:

“Now, therefore, in the name of the people of the State of Michigan, you are hereby commanded that you take the body of the said Walter Ridgley, if…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carnahan v. CarnahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Ridgley v. RidgleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harvey v. LewisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Schaheen v. SchaheenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. American Oil Co. v. SuhonenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API