Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 2, 1966No. Civ. No. 6163PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

Pursuant to the Order of this Court filed herein on March 22, 1966, an evidentiary hearing was conducted on August 30, 1966 on the issue of fact joined herein by the plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, said issue pertaining to the alleged fraudulent joinder as a defendant herein of the Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company, hereinafter called Katy Railroad, by the plaintiff alleging that he was, at the time of his injury involved herein, an employee of the Katy Railroad and entitled to proceed against it in this case under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carl Dodd v. Fawcett Publications, Inc., a Corporation, and Mid-Continent News Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  2. Docheney v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kelley v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hunter v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Ciaccio v. New Orleans Public Belt Railroad CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1968
  4. Kelley v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Immigration and Customs EnforcementDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API