Legal Opinion

STRICKLEN v. O.I.P.M., L.L.C.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 9, 2016No. Case Number: 114937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bay Mitchell, Judge:

¶ 1 Plaintiff/Appellant Kristi Stridden (“Stridden”) appeals the trial court’s dismissal of her claims against Defendants/Appellees O.I.P.M., L.L.C. (“OIPM”), Michael Anderson (“Anderson”) and Fisher & Fisher (“Fisher & Fisher”) (collectively, “Appel-lees”). The trial court dismissed Strieklen’s suit for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Following our review of this accelerated appeal under Supreme Court Rule 1.36, we AFFIRM the decision of the trial court.

¶ 2 Stridden’s suit against Appellees stemmed from another lawsuit to collect unpaid…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Lockhart v. LoosenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Woods Petroleum Corp. v. SledgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Cooper v. Parker-HugheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Samson Investment Co. v. ChevaillierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adewale Eniola Tawose v. Matthew L. Winton, et al.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2026
  2. Modoc Nation v. ShahDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API