Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Spector v. Fusco-Amatruda Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 5, 1965No. Civ. No. 9385PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZAMPANO, District Judge.
In this action before the Court without a jury the plaintiff, Howard Spector, seeks recovery in contract. from The Fusco-Amatruda Company, hereinafter referred to as defendant, and The Travelers Indemnity Company, as surety, under the provisions of the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 270 b.
During the year 1960, the defendant was awarded a government contract for the construction of navy barracks on an eleven acre tract owned by the government in New London, Connecticut. As part of the work the defendant was required to purchase and spread loam in preparation for the seeding of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allis v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Snelling v. MerrittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Home Owners' Loan Corporation v. StevensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Milford Yacht Realty Co. v. Milford Yacht Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- CN Monroe Manufacturing Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- John C. Thomas v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- John C. Thomas v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972