Legal Opinion

United States v. Jones

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 26, 1935No. 1247PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit to recover upon a war risk insurance contract. Trial by jury was waived and the cause was submitted to the court. The material facts were found in favor of plaintiff and judgment followed.

A motion was lodged in this court to strike the bill of exceptions and it must be sustained because the bill was admittedly settled after the expiration of the term at which the judgment was entered and there concededly was neither a standing order of the court nor' a special order entered in this case extending the term for that purpose. In the absence of such an order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  2. Tramel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  3. Gardner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. Lonsdale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Saunders v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  2. Continental Petroleum Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  3. United States v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API