Laumann v. National Hockey League
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
In a companion Opinion issued today, I held that the damages model submitted by plaintiffs’ expert, Dr. Roger Noll, must be excluded as unreliable under Daubert.1 The purpose of this Opinion (the “Certification Opinion”) is to address whether the litigation may proceed on a class-wide basis. Plaintiffs have moved to certify two *388classes — first, the class of consumers “who purchased [ ] ‘out-of-market paekage[s]’ ... online” (the “Internet Class”),2 and second, the class of consumers “who purchased [ ] ‘out-of-market packages’…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re Libor-Based Fin. Instruments Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Belfiore v. Procter & Gamble Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Goldemberg v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Douglin v. GreatBanc Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.