Legal Opinion
Frias v. Patenaude & Felix APC
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided March 30, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00805Unknown
1Opinion
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 FERNANDO FRIAS, CASE NO. C20-0805-JCC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 PATENAUDE & FELIX, A.P.C., 13 Defendant. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Patenaude & Felix, A.P.C.’s motion to 16 dismiss (Dkt. No. 10). Having thoroughly considered the parties’ briefing and the relevant 17 record, the Court finds oral argument unnecessary and hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in 18 part the motion for the reasons explained herein. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 Defendant…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.