Legal Opinion

Tolliver v. Standard Oil Company

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 8, 1968No. 52587PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BTORCKMAN, Judge.

This is a suit for damages in two ■counts. The eleven plaintiffs originally filed separate suits of identical nature which were consolidated by court order. Since the consolidation is not under attack, the cases will sometimes be referred to as one action. Count 1 of the petition purports to state a cause of action against Standard Oil Company only,for its alleged failure to furnish a service letter in compliance with § 290.140, RSMo 1959, V.A. M.S. The damages sought on this count in each case are $5,000 actual and $5,000 punitive. Count 1 was dismissed by the trial court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Christy v. PetrusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Royster v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. Hall v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  4. Williams v. Kansas City Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. Hundley v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Labrier v. Anheuser Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  2. Cady v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Commercial Bank of St. Louis County v. JamesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. Flynn v. Lucas County Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  5. Johnson v. Great Heritage Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API