Legal Opinion

Stitt v. Nautilus Enterprises, Inc.

Fairfax County Circuit Court

Decided April 25, 1989No. Case No. (Chancery) 109237PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By JUDGE LEWIS HALL GRIFFITH

This case is before the Court on the demurrer of two defendants, Sport and Health, Inc., and John H. Ariail, Jr., to the bill of complaint filed by the County of Fairfax.

The County alleges that Sport and Health, Inc., and Nautilus Enterprises, Inc., signed a joint venture agreement in 1984. Thereafter, Nautilus represented to consumers that if they purchased a Nautilus membership, they would have unrestricted access to Courts Royal facilities, which are owned by Sport and Health. Nautilus members were allowed unrestricted access to Courts Royal until June of 1987,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bourgeois v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  2. Crall & Ostrander v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  3. Alban Tractor Co. v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Branin v. TMC Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2011
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Gilmore v. GreenbergRichmond County Circuit Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API