Legal Opinion
Findlay v. City of Tulsa
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided March 17, 1977No. M-76-674PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSSEY, Presiding Judge.
Appellant, Joseph Wilson Findlay, Jr., hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged in the Municipal Court of Record for the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Case No. 211275, with the offense of Public Intoxication in violation of 27, Tulsa Revised Ordinances, § 171. He was tried and convicted, with punishment being set at a fine of Twenty-Five ($25.00) Dollars and costs. From said judgment and sentence, a timely appeal has been perfected.
The State’s first witness was Dan Marshall, police officer for the City of Tulsa, who testified that he was called to the scene…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- In re NewbernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
- General Motors Corp., Argonaut Division v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Synnott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rife v. Oklahoma Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
- People in Interest of TMSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Harrison v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re Adoption of the 2005 Revisions to the Oklahoma Uniform Jury Instructions—CriminalCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.