Legal Opinion
Rice v. Morris
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 7, 1976No. 1054PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
The appellees, in their motion for rehearing, have called our attention to certain clerical errors and to the fact that the appellants did not file a motion for summary judgment, therefore precluding this Court from rendering judgment for appellants. See Cowar v. Woodrum, 472 S.W.2d 749 (Tex.Sup.1971); Hinojosa v. Edgerton, 447 S.W.2d 670 (Tex.Sup.1969); Alamo National Bank of San Antonio v. Hurd, 485 S.W.2d 335 (Tex.Civ.App. — San Antonio 1972, writ ref’d n.r.e.). We, therefore, withdraw our original Opinion and the following Opinion is substituted therefor.
This…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Boyd v. Frost National Bank of S.A.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
- Powers v. First Natl. Bank of CorsicanaTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Kettler v. AtkinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Sellers v. PowersTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Allred v. BeggsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re the Estate of TeubertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Shriners Hospitals for Children, In Its Capacity as Beneficiary of the Alfred J. and Pegge A. Cooksley Trust v. First Northern Bank of Wyoming, In Its Capacity as Trustee of the Alfred J. and Pegge A. Cooksley TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1988
- Foshee v. Republic National Bank of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Foshee v. Republic National Bank of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.