State v. Mieritz
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtSchudson, J.
Christy N. Mieritz appeals from the judgment of conviction, following her guilty plea, for delivery of cocaine, party to a crime. She argues that the trial court should have granted her motion to suppress evidence because the undercover officer who purchased cocaine from her was outside his jurisdiction when he did so. We conclude that suppression of evidence is not a constitutionally required remedy when a law enforcement officer is outside his or her jurisdiction when obtaining evidence. Therefore, we affirm.
The facts are undisputed. On April 22, 1993, City of Waukesha Police Detective…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Illinois v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Maryland v. MacOnSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Conrad v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. BarrettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. PopenhagenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
- State v. PiddingtonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
- State v. SteffesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- State v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.